You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 5 Area under the ROC curve performances on the first group of dataset

From: Deep learning architectures for prediction of nucleosome positioning from sequences data

 

N_score [16]

NuPop [17]

NucEnergEN [14]

Segal [10]

Field [11]

Kaplan [12]

Heijden [13]

Finestr [15]

DLNN-3

DLNN-5

HM-LC

0.65

(0.6,0.65)

(0.6,0.65)

(0.35,0.4)

0.65

0.65

0.6

(0.6, 0.65)

0.79

0.81

DM-LC

0.59

(0.65,0.70)

0.7

0.33

(0.70,0.75)

(0.70,0.75)

(0.65,0.70)

0.57

0.71

0.71

YS-WG

0.77

0.74

(0.65,0.70)

0.49

0.77

0.7

0.65

0.7

0.79

0.83

HM-PM

(0.6,0.65)

0.67

(0.6,0.65)

(0.4,0.45)

(0.6,0.65)

0.6

0.55

0.55

0.77

0.77

DM-PM

0.62

0.7

(0.70,0.75)

0.32

(0.70,0.75)

(0.70,0.75)

(0.55,0.6)

(0.5,0.55)

0.72

0.73

YS-PM

0.70

0.74

(0.7,0.75)

0.52

0.79

(0.7,0.75)

0.65

0.7

0.73

0.83

HM-5U

(0.55,0.6)

0.65

0.7

0.37

0.65

0.65

0.6

(0.55,0.6)

0.67

0.68

DM-5U

0.54

(0.6,0.65)

(0.65,0.70)

0.38

(0.65,0.70)

(0.65,0.70)

(0.55,0.6)

0.5

0.66

0.67

  1. Each column refers to a computational method for nucleosome positioning. The rst eight column show the values reported in the paper by Liu et al. [47], sometimes with approximate values (interval range or close to symbol”). Last two columns regard our proposed method. Best values are in bold